Talk:PM2.5 exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(dispute moved from main page to here)
 
(Parameters corrected)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Which dose metric should be used?==
==Which dose metric should be used?==


{{discussion
{{Discussion
|Dispute= Which dose metric should be used?
|Statements  = Which dose metric should be used?
* A) Dose in units mg/kg/d (result 0.0008 mg/kg/d (based on formula))
* A) Dose in units mg/kg/d (result 0.0008 mg/kg/d (based on formula))
* B) Exposure concentration in units µg/m<sup>3</sup> (0.02 µg/m3 (based on data))
* B) Exposure concentration in units µg/m<sup>3</sup> (0.02 µg/m3 (based on data))

Revision as of 08:14, 16 November 2009

Which dose metric should be used?

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement: Which dose metric should be used?
  • A) Dose in units mg/kg/d (result 0.0008 mg/kg/d (based on formula))
  • B) Exposure concentration in units µg/m3 (0.02 µg/m3 (based on data))

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:
←--#1:: . All exposure-response functions are using exposure concentration as the metric. Therefore B) should be used instead of dose. --Jouni 21:58, 27 March 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)