Talk:Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment: Indicators: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(moved from main page) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Decisions related to Hämeenkyrö case | *Decisions related to Hämeenkyrö case | ||
*Possible indicators (optimising variables) in Hämeenkyrö | *Possible indicators (optimising variables) in Hämeenkyrö | ||
Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
Kari Auri | Kari Auri | ||
=====Discussion on | =====Discussion on well-being indicators ===== | ||
{{Resolution | {{Resolution |
Revision as of 08:07, 22 September 2006
- Decisions related to Hämeenkyrö case
- Possible indicators (optimising variables) in Hämeenkyrö
Well-being of the population (smells, comfort, noise)
Kari Auri
Discussion on well-being indicators
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
|
Effects on economy (esp. gas energy plant)
Juha
Discussion on effect on economy
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
Probably it could be possible to use also ash produced by MSWI? In Elimäki new factory was started where they produce forest fertilizer from the ash, which means that ash is not waste any longer but can be used (in case it is clear enough to be spread on the ground). -Sanna
|
Transportation costs of waste
Anne
Discussion on ...
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
|
Health effects of dioxins and PM2.5
Anu T
Discussion on short term effects of dioxins
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←--Short term effects of dioxins only occur when the acute doses exceed the current background exposures by several orders of magnitude. This kind of exposures are not possible in the case of MSWI, and they can be excluded.: . --Jouni 10:33, 21 September 2006 (EEST), Anu {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|